Passively raped?
Or as Gbaji refers to it "making love".
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- Might as well misogyny
Might as well misogynyFollow
Disclaimer:
To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.
To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.
Timelordwho wrote:
Really, all light arms aren't effective as a check against tyranny, but they are a means to buy time with bodies until you can scrounge up some heavier weaponry.
WOLVERINES!!!
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
Samira wrote:
Quote:
Millions of people wielding their own weapons in defense of a tyrannical government is why we have the second amendment.
Yes, that's called an army.
Yes but before that it's a mob which joined up with a splinter faction of the army. If you'd like to see the concept in action, look into the FSA. . They didn't quite get the resources they needed to push to Damascus and decisively end the conflict, but I don't think it can be argued that it's not a threat to the State.
Edited, May 30th 2014 1:25pm by Timelordwho
Just as Planned.
I thought this thread was about haircuts.
Jophiel wrote:
Timelordwho wrote:
Really, all light arms aren't effective as a check against tyranny, but they are a means to buy time with bodies until you can scrounge up some heavier weaponry.
Edited, May 30th 2014 1:39pm by lolgaxe
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
zamwiki wrote:
Just ask Oswald.
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
zamwiki wrote:
I'd say the American people are better armed than the north Vietnamese.
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
zamwiki wrote:
Am I the one banning people from my business based on their personal beliefs?
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
Smasharoo wrote:
Millions of people wielding their own weapons in defense of a tyrannical government is why we have the second amendment. No amount of quantifying will ever change this.
Maybe, actually. The problem now is that the "weapons" being wielded against the "tyrannical government" may as well be room temperature ramen. They're about as effective. If the "tyrannical government" feels like killing you, and it can find you, you'll be dead regardless of how many rounds of 7.62 you stockpiled. In seconds.
Maybe, actually. The problem now is that the "weapons" being wielded against the "tyrannical government" may as well be room temperature ramen. They're about as effective. If the "tyrannical government" feels like killing you, and it can find you, you'll be dead regardless of how many rounds of 7.62 you stockpiled. In seconds.
Depends on the State. In the US, absolutely, but then we're back to a MORE GUNS or NO GUNS circus.
Forcing a government to start racking up a body count is probably more effective than the guns actually are in instituting change. If a government had to decide between killing a third of it's citizens or taking a more moderate course, it's a reasonable deterrent, if not necessarily a militarily effective one. It also lends a causus belli for other governments to get in on the game of dismantling that state for their own benefit (examples of this aren't particularly hard to find).This typically happens in non Hegemony states, but they still fall victim to it occasionally, and it's probably a more likely cause of dissolution than most of the other usual suspects.
Just as Planned.
zamwiki wrote:
I'd say the American people are better armed than the north Vietnamese.
Sure, but the power differential equation between central state power, citizen power and secondary aligned state power is very different.
Edited, May 30th 2014 1:40pm by Timelordwho
Just as Planned.
Quote:
For what it's worth, the guy also related with Zuko from Avatar the Last Airbender.
What? That's crazy. Zuko has great luck with women.
Forcing a government to start racking up a body count is probably more effective than the guns actually are in instituting change. If a government had to decide between killing a third of it's citizens or taking a more moderate course, it's a reasonable deterrent, if not necessarily a militarily effective one. It also lends a causus belli for other governments to get in on the game of dismantling that state for their own benefit (examples of this aren't particularly hard to find).This typically happens in non Hegemony states, but they still fall victim to it occasionally, and it's probably a more likely cause of dissolution than most of the other usual suspects.
In point of fact, I'd say it virtually never happens in a modern context. Other nation states intentionally destabilize, sure. Organic uprisings of populations? Close to unheard of.
In point of fact, I'd say it virtually never happens in a modern context. Other nation states intentionally destabilize, sure. Organic uprisings of populations? Close to unheard of.
Disclaimer:
To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.
To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.
Smasharoo wrote:
Forcing a government to start racking up a body count is probably more effective than the guns actually are in instituting change. If a government had to decide between killing a third of it's citizens or taking a more moderate course, it's a reasonable deterrent, if not necessarily a militarily effective one. It also lends a causus belli for other governments to get in on the game of dismantling that state for their own benefit (examples of this aren't particularly hard to find).This typically happens in non Hegemony states, but they still fall victim to it occasionally, and it's probably a more likely cause of dissolution than most of the other usual suspects.
In point of fact, I'd say it virtually never happens in a modern context. Other nation states intentionally destabilize, sure. Organic uprisings of populations? Close to unheard of.
In point of fact, I'd say it virtually never happens in a modern context. Other nation states intentionally destabilize, sure. Organic uprisings of populations? Close to unheard of.
What are the time bounds for modern?
Edited, May 30th 2014 2:02pm by Timelordwho
Just as Planned.
What are the time bounds for modern?
Post World War 2?
Post World War 2?
Disclaimer:
To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.
To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.
zamwiki wrote:
See the difference?
I see more similarities.
If you want political ideology to be a protected class then you go get the laws made, create the agency, hire the enforcers and then once you have that nice bureaucratic red ball of tape rolling, you can tell the dude that he has to let the republicans eat in his restaurant.
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
Smasharoo wrote:
What are the time bounds for modern?
Post World War 2?
Post World War 2?
Iceland had an organic uprising which replaced their government in '09
Burma is, was and will be a site for organic uprisings.
Just as Planned.
zamwiki wrote:
Jophiel wrote:
Why do you hate the free market?
What does that have to do with the free market? Are you saying you shouldn't be allowed to ban those people?
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
Jophiel wrote:
What does that have to do with the free market?
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
zamwiki wrote:
Nope I think a business owner should be able to serve whom they choose; unlike you and your Democrat buddies.
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
I only think a business should be able to ban someone for actions, myself.
Chipotle: Love guns? Wearing an "I love guns" T-Shirt with an NRA baseball cap? Whatever, come in and get a cheap burrito.
Brandishing guns inside our store and scaring our other customers? We don't want you in here.
See the difference?
Businesses have the right to refuse to serve and eject people for actions, like not wearing shoes or pooping on the floor. They shouldn't have the right to refuse someone who has the wrong skin color or who is wearing a burka or who happens to be holding hands with someone of the same sex. (Holding hands is not considered an offensive action in America, outside of Bobby Jones University.)
Chipotle: Love guns? Wearing an "I love guns" T-Shirt with an NRA baseball cap? Whatever, come in and get a cheap burrito.
Brandishing guns inside our store and scaring our other customers? We don't want you in here.
See the difference?
Businesses have the right to refuse to serve and eject people for actions, like not wearing shoes or pooping on the floor. They shouldn't have the right to refuse someone who has the wrong skin color or who is wearing a burka or who happens to be holding hands with someone of the same sex. (Holding hands is not considered an offensive action in America, outside of Bobby Jones University.)
Iceland had an organic uprising which replaced their government in '09
Burma is, was and will be a site for organic uprisings.
Yeah, I guess. Iceland was closer to a vote of no confidence than a revolution, but sure. Burma is barely a nation state. If there was much worth fighting over, a larger player would make it a proxy state. India, most likely, that may be happening regardless.
Burma is, was and will be a site for organic uprisings.
Yeah, I guess. Iceland was closer to a vote of no confidence than a revolution, but sure. Burma is barely a nation state. If there was much worth fighting over, a larger player would make it a proxy state. India, most likely, that may be happening regardless.
Disclaimer:
To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.
To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.
Recent Visitors: 445
All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (445)
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- Might as well misogyny
© 2024 Fanbyte LLC