Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Meanwhile in the State of Isreal/Palestine(?)Follow

#27 Mar 19 2014 at 1:53 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Stalker rdmcandie wrote:
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=israel+bulldozing+homes

didn't happen though.


Bulldozing all the Palestinian chairs? No, it didn't. Let's recall that "chairs" in this analogy refers to places people live/control. Blowing up the homes of suicide bombers, while controversial, is not the same thing.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#28 Mar 19 2014 at 1:55 PM Rating: Excellent
Blowing up the home of a suicide bomber.... something about that just doesn't seem productive.

If the person has already done the bombing, they are obviously not at their home. You're killing their family in that case. If the person has not done the bombing, then how do you know they are, in fact, a suicide bomber?

#29 Mar 19 2014 at 2:08 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Belkira the Tulip wrote:
Blowing up the home of a suicide bomber.... something about that just doesn't seem productive.

If the person has already done the bombing, they are obviously not at their home. You're killing their family in that case. If the person has not done the bombing, then how do you know they are, in fact, a suicide bomber?`


Like I said, it's controversial. The thinking is that the families of suicide bombers often encourage their sons/daughters in the act, and are often rewarded by various terrorist organizations for having a relative who completed a suicide mission. Thus, it's fair to punish them for the act of the bomber. Additionally, the theory is that if a potential bomber knows that his family will become homeless as a result of his action, he might think twice about it.

I'm not agreeing with or defending the practice here, but this is *not* analogous to the larger scale land control and statehood issues we were originally talking about.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#30 Mar 19 2014 at 2:10 PM Rating: Good
gbaji wrote:
I'm not agreeing with or defending the practice here...


I don't mean to suggest that you are. Was merely commenting on the concept of blowing up a suicide bomber's house and family.
#31 Mar 19 2014 at 2:30 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Belkira the Tulip wrote:
gbaji wrote:
I'm not agreeing with or defending the practice here...


I don't mean to suggest that you are. Was merely commenting on the concept of blowing up a suicide bomber's house and family.


My understanding is that it's usually just the house, not the family. Well, unless they refuse to leave the house, I suppose. But then that's just proof that they're a witch, right?
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#32 Mar 19 2014 at 2:36 PM Rating: Good
*******
50,767 posts
Terrorists and ducks weight the same.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#33 Mar 19 2014 at 2:49 PM Rating: Good
gbaji wrote:
Belkira the Tulip wrote:
gbaji wrote:
I'm not agreeing with or defending the practice here...


I don't mean to suggest that you are. Was merely commenting on the concept of blowing up a suicide bomber's house and family.


My understanding is that it's usually just the house, not the family. Well, unless they refuse to leave the house, I suppose. But then that's just proof that they're a witch, right?


I didn't imagine it was so controlled. I mean, does a guy with a big black bomb with a wick sticking out of it ring the doorbell and inform the family inside their house is about to be blown up, and could you please vacate the premises?
#34 Mar 19 2014 at 2:51 PM Rating: Excellent
Meat Popsicle
*****
13,666 posts
My understanding is they get escorted out by armed guards (assuming they hadn't vacated already), and an armored bulldozer smashes it flat.
____________________________
That monster in the mirror, he just might be you. -Grover
#35 Mar 19 2014 at 2:58 PM Rating: Good
someproteinguy wrote:
My understanding is they get escorted out by armed guards (assuming they hadn't vacated already), and an armored bulldozer smashes it flat.


Ah. I suppose I was confused by the use of "blown up."
#36 Mar 19 2014 at 3:13 PM Rating: Excellent
Meat Popsicle
*****
13,666 posts
Belkira the Tulip wrote:
someproteinguy wrote:
My understanding is they get escorted out by armed guards (assuming they hadn't vacated already), and an armored bulldozer smashes it flat.


Ah. I suppose I was confused by the use of "blown up."
Probably not the best choice of words. I mean the end result is the same and all, but if I showed up somewhere expecting something to explode and had to watch a bulldozer instead I'd be a little disappointed.
____________________________
That monster in the mirror, he just might be you. -Grover
#37 Mar 19 2014 at 3:15 PM Rating: Excellent
*******
50,767 posts
I'd just place the lawn chair closer. I'm not gonna waste a bag of popcorn.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#38 Mar 19 2014 at 3:36 PM Rating: Default
Avatar
****
7,564 posts
gbaji wrote:
Stalker rdmcandie wrote:
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=israel+bulldozing+homes

didn't happen though.


Bulldozing all the Palestinian chairs? No, it didn't. Let's recall that "chairs" in this analogy refers to places people live/control. Blowing up the homes of suicide bombers, while controversial, is not the same thing.


Yes it is, it is destroying homes of Palestinians. If you think its just limited to "suicide" bombers you are delusional. Over 2700 Permits were granted over the past 2 yearsfor the destruction of Palestinian homes. Must have been a big year for the suicide bomb business. Eh Eh!.

And I am wearing the blinders. Come on guy, Israel is just as much at fault for their current situation as Palestine is for their current situation. Folks like you that are ignorant to one side over the other are the reason that its been able to fester for 60 years.

They aren't bulldozing peoples chairs! Except when they do do it! But it doesn't count because some of those chairs housed suicide bombers! What a chuckle@#%^.





Edited, Mar 19th 2014 5:38pm by rdmcandie
____________________________
HEY GOOGLE. **** OFF YOU. **** YOUR ******** SEARCH ENGINE IN ITS ******* ****** BINARY ***. ALL DAY LONG.

#39 Mar 19 2014 at 4:44 PM Rating: Default
Scholar
***
1,323 posts
gbaji wrote:
Stalker rdmcandie wrote:
hehehe Gbaji must have missed the part where Israel bulldozed all the Palestinian chairs to make room for their own.


Um... No, I didn't, because that didn't happen. Go look up the population number and mix prior to the whole "Zionist homeland" movement. Then come back to this thread once you realize that there was almost no one living in the area until European Zionists came along and started building aqueducts and irrigation systems and settling the now habitable lands that were previously unsettled. I correctly addressed this with the part about a room with 20 chairs but room for 100.

Israel built all those chairs. Yes, even the ones the Palestinians are claiming were theirs all along. The properties the Palestinians are claiming they were ejected from? All existed as a direct result of the Zionist development efforts in the 20th century. You don't really think that those homes and streets existed before then, do you? What happened is that the Jewish folks massively built up the area, benefiting themselves and the people who were living there (a good percentage of which were Jewish as well). They were so successful at this that people started flocking there from the surrounding areas to live there.

Then, after this massive population boom, the Muslims decided they didn't want to live in a "Jewish state", so when the British Mandate was set to end and the nation of Israel would take full control, they insisted on dividing the region into two separate states. So even though the Israelis had more or less built everything that was there and made it possible for so many people to live there in the first place, they agreed to this. Then, literally the day the Mandate ended, the Muslims (now calling themselves Palestinians, a name which previously just applied to all people living in the area) worked with all three surrounding Muslim nations (Syria, Jordan, and Egypt) to attack the new nation of Israel. It didn't work. Israel captured the entire area, and some portions of the other three nations as well.

Despite this, and despite getting directly screwed over every single time they've dealt in good faith with the "Palestinians", Israel has continued to try to find some way to live in peace in that area. They've given away land only to have that land used as staging areas for attacks against them. When the take it back again, they're told they must give it back again (only to have the same thing happen again). They've made land/property swap deals, and have moved their people as required, only to have the other side refuse to do the same. It's happened again, and again, and again. It's just impossible to deal with a group of people who just want you gone. Period. And failing to recognize that and react to that means you will get wiped out.

You have to be wearing amazingly strong antisemitic blinders on to think that this is all Israel's fault. It's just one of those things that I find shocking that anyone actually takes the side of Palestine after all of this. I mean, they don't even pretend that they aren't actively engaged in terrorist actions, nor do they hide their objective to destroy the state of Israel. But somehow, stacked against that, people choose to blame Israel whenever they dare to fight back? That's insane. So folks in Gaza are launching rockets targeting civilian targets in Israel, and that's just peachy, but heaven forbid that an Israeli strike on those rocket emplacements might happen to kill a couple civilians! Wow. Just... wow. Serious blinders going on there.


Um.. you do know how Israel state was created right relatively recently? Just a hint, it wasn't there not so many years ago.

You do not have to antisemitic to see the perspective of the Palestinians.. Not if you actually look at the history.


Edited, Mar 19th 2014 6:47pm by angrymnk
____________________________
Your soul was made of fists.

Jar the Sam
#40 Mar 19 2014 at 6:00 PM Rating: Default
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Stalker rdmcandie wrote:
gbaji wrote:
Stalker rdmcandie wrote:
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=israel+bulldozing+homes

didn't happen though.


Bulldozing all the Palestinian chairs? No, it didn't. Let's recall that "chairs" in this analogy refers to places people live/control. Blowing up the homes of suicide bombers, while controversial, is not the same thing.


Yes it is, it is destroying homes of Palestinians.


But not all Palestinians, right? Not even a tiny percentage of Palestinians. So there's some factor other than just being Palestinian which causes these homes to be destroyed. We should maybe look at that rather than proclaim this to be some broad attack on Palestinian rights.


Quote:
If you think its just limited to "suicide" bombers you are delusional. Over 2700 Permits were granted over the past 2 yearsfor the destruction of Palestinian homes. Must have been a big year for the suicide bomb business. Eh Eh!.


And what percentage is that? Look, the very fact that they have to get permits for this suggests that it's far more on the up and up than say, lobbing rockets at civilians. Which happened like 60 times last year.


Quote:
And I am wearing the blinders. Come on guy, Israel is just as much at fault for their current situation as Palestine is for their current situation. Folks like you that are ignorant to one side over the other are the reason that its been able to fester for 60 years.


Do you honestly believe that if Israel tomorrow granted the Palestinians every single thing they are asking for, it would end the violence or prevent the complete destruction of their nation? You're demanding infinite restraint of a nation that is subject to attacks that will never end until they are destroyed. What do you realistically expect Israel to do?

Quote:
They aren't bulldozing peoples chairs! Except when they do do it! But it doesn't count because some of those chairs housed suicide bombers! What a chuckle@#%^.


You kinda lost the analogy along the way though.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#41 Mar 19 2014 at 6:10 PM Rating: Default
Scholar
***
1,323 posts
gbaji wrote:
[

Do you honestly believe that if Israel tomorrow granted the Palestinians every single thing they are asking for, it would end the violence or prevent the complete destruction of their nation? You're demanding infinite restraint of a nation that is subject to attacks that will never end until they are destroyed. What do you realistically expect Israel to do?


Some people simply believe that if you treat people the way Jews were treated in Warsaw Ghetto, you may not have a higher moral ground; particularly if you just had it done to you.

It may surprise you Gbaji, but Polandball is not always an accurate depiction of nation state relationships..

____________________________
Your soul was made of fists.

Jar the Sam
#42 Mar 19 2014 at 6:11 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
angrymnk wrote:
Um.. you do know how Israel state was created right relatively recently? Just a hint, it wasn't there not so many years ago.


And? When exactly was the Palestinian state created?

Quote:
You do not have to antisemitic to see the perspective of the Palestinians.. Not if you actually look at the history.


To see the perspective of the Palestinians? No. To agree with the actions of their leaders? Yes. You kinda do. How else do you defend constant rocket and mortar attacks targeting civilians? The Palestinian people are pawns in an ideological war against the existence of a Jewish state. Period. What do you supposed drives that?

Edited, Mar 19th 2014 5:18pm by gbaji
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#43 Mar 19 2014 at 6:16 PM Rating: Good
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
angrymnk wrote:
gbaji wrote:
Do you honestly believe that if Israel tomorrow granted the Palestinians every single thing they are asking for, it would end the violence or prevent the complete destruction of their nation? You're demanding infinite restraint of a nation that is subject to attacks that will never end until they are destroyed. What do you realistically expect Israel to do?


Some people simply believe that if you treat people the way Jews were treated in Warsaw Ghetto, you may not have a higher moral ground; particularly if you just had it done to you.


I honestly have no freaking clue what you're trying to say.



Yeah. What part of me saying that's a super simplistic way to view the situation zoomed over your head the first time? While I suppose there may be some people who look the other way with regard to Israel out of some kind of guilt or sorrow over the holocaust, that does not remove the fact that their actions are overwhelmingly defensive and against an enemy that has not stopped trying to destroy it since the first day they came into existence.


If you really want to blame someone for the plight of the Palestinian people, blame Egypt, Jordan, and Syria. Not Israel.

Edited, Mar 19th 2014 5:17pm by gbaji
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#44 Mar 19 2014 at 6:27 PM Rating: Default
Scholar
***
1,323 posts
gbaji wrote:
angrymnk wrote:
gbaji wrote:
Do you honestly believe that if Israel tomorrow granted the Palestinians every single thing they are asking for, it would end the violence or prevent the complete destruction of their nation? You're demanding infinite restraint of a nation that is subject to attacks that will never end until they are destroyed. What do you realistically expect Israel to do?


Some people simply believe that if you treat people the way Jews were treated in Warsaw Ghetto, you may not have a higher moral ground; particularly if you just had it done to you.


I honestly have no freaking clue what you're trying to say.



Yeah. What part of me saying that's a super simplistic way to view the situation zoomed over your head the first time? While I suppose there may be some people who look the other way with regard to Israel out of some kind of guilt or sorrow over the holocaust, that does not remove the fact that their actions are overwhelmingly defensive and against an enemy that has not stopped trying to destroy it since the first day they came into existence.


If you really want to blame someone for the plight of the Palestinian people, blame Egypt, Jordan, and Syria. Not Israel.

Edited, Mar 19th 2014 5:17pm by gbaji


Yes, and since offense is best defense, being overwhelmingly defensive is not always the best approach.

Huh? Why not blame Canada? How about Germany? Or UK?

How about we stop trying to blame actors different than the actual sides to the conflict?

Egypt... yeah, because Israel never did anything to **** them off. Lavon affair never happened.

Edited, Mar 19th 2014 8:28pm by angrymnk

Edited, Mar 19th 2014 8:28pm by angrymnk
____________________________
Your soul was made of fists.

Jar the Sam
#45 Mar 19 2014 at 7:14 PM Rating: Good
*******
50,767 posts
angrymnk wrote:
Why not blame Canada?
Because if you're gonna blame someone, you kind of want a believable scape-goat.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#46 Mar 19 2014 at 7:41 PM Rating: Good
****
4,137 posts
.
____________________________
Dandruffshampoo wrote:
Curses, beaten by Professor stupidopo-opo.
Annabella, Goblin in Disguise wrote:
Stupidmonkey is more organized than a bag of raccoons.
#47 Mar 19 2014 at 8:08 PM Rating: Good
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
angrymnk wrote:
gbaji wrote:
If you really want to blame someone for the plight of the Palestinian people, blame Egypt, Jordan, and Syria. Not Israel.


Yes, and since offense is best defense, being overwhelmingly defensive is not always the best approach.

Huh? Why not blame Canada? How about Germany? Or UK?


Um... Because those countries didn't attack the nation of Israel in an attempt to destroy it on the first day of it's existence? You do understand that immediately after the British Mandate ended, a coalition of Arab states sent military forces into the brand new nation of Israel with the express intent of destroying the whole thing and turning it into one Arab state instead?

Quote:
How about we stop trying to blame actors different than the actual sides to the conflict?


Like Egypt, Syria, and Jordan? Sure.

Quote:
Egypt... yeah, because Israel never did anything to **** them off. Lavon affair never happened.


Not at the time when Egypt first sent forces in to destroy Israel, no. Please tell me you are aware that Egypt (and all the other bordering Arab states) sent military forces into Israel to try to wipe it out in 1948. The Lavon affair occurred in 1954 IIRC, and constituted a series of frankly amateurish attacks that were less damaging (and far less fatal) than those committed by the Weather Underground here in the US. That's hardly equivalent to launching a full scale military attack on another nation, is it?

And again, one happened before the other. You kinda can't say that Egypt attacked Israel because of the Lavon affair. We could argue the other way around though. So what was your point again? That Egypt (and Syria and Jordan) had no reason to attack Israel other than just not liking Jews and not wanting a Jewish state. They could not accept a solution in which both a Jewish Palestinian state and an Arab Palestinian state would exist. They wanted only an Arab state there. What is that if not antisemitism?


And while we can point to various actions back and forth over the years, that fact has ruled the entire conflict. The Arab "side" desires nothing short of the absence of a Jewish state in the region. Period. The Israelis have repeatedly shown a willingness to share the land and allow both sides to have their own state. So yeah, even if I don't agree with every single action the Israelis have taken over the years, they are the far more reasonable side.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#48 Mar 19 2014 at 8:41 PM Rating: Default
Scholar
***
1,323 posts
gbaji wrote:
angrymnk wrote:
gbaji wrote:
If you really want to blame someone for the plight of the Palestinian people, blame Egypt, Jordan, and Syria. Not Israel.


Yes, and since offense is best defense, being overwhelmingly defensive is not always the best approach.

Huh? Why not blame Canada? How about Germany? Or UK?


Um... Because those countries didn't attack the nation of Israel in an attempt to destroy it on the first day of it's existence? You do understand that immediately after the British Mandate ended, a coalition of Arab states sent military forces into the brand new nation of Israel with the express intent of destroying the whole thing and turning it into one Arab state instead?

Quote:
How about we stop trying to blame actors different than the actual sides to the conflict?


Like Egypt, Syria, and Jordan? Sure.

Quote:
Egypt... yeah, because Israel never did anything to **** them off. Lavon affair never happened.


Not at the time when Egypt first sent forces in to destroy Israel, no. Please tell me you are aware that Egypt (and all the other bordering Arab states) sent military forces into Israel to try to wipe it out in 1948. The Lavon affair occurred in 1954 IIRC, and constituted a series of frankly amateurish attacks that were less damaging (and far less fatal) than those committed by the Weather Underground here in the US. That's hardly equivalent to launching a full scale military attack on another nation, is it?

And again, one happened before the other. You kinda can't say that Egypt attacked Israel because of the Lavon affair. We could argue the other way around though. So what was your point again? That Egypt (and Syria and Jordan) had no reason to attack Israel other than just not liking Jews and not wanting a Jewish state. They could not accept a solution in which both a Jewish Palestinian state and an Arab Palestinian state would exist. They wanted only an Arab state there. What is that if not antisemitism?


And while we can point to various actions back and forth over the years, that fact has ruled the entire conflict. The Arab "side" desires nothing short of the absence of a Jewish state in the region. Period. The Israelis have repeatedly shown a willingness to share the land and allow both sides to have their own state. So yeah, even if I don't agree with every single action the Israelis have taken over the years, they are the far more reasonable side.


Huh?

Seriously?

You do understand that in the eyes of the Arab nations, that, from their perspective, the creation of a random nation in the middle of their backyards might be somewhat aggravating?

I do get that might is right,and to the victor belong the spoils, but I would like you to at least acknowledge that Israel wasn't there 100 years ago. Arab nations were.


Edited, Mar 19th 2014 10:43pm by angrymnk
____________________________
Your soul was made of fists.

Jar the Sam
#49 Mar 19 2014 at 11:30 PM Rating: Excellent
Meat Popsicle
*****
13,666 posts
Egyptians, Romans, Persians, Greeks, Turks, Arabs, various crusader groups... does anyone NOT have a claim to the region in their past? I mean, maybe the Chinese or something, but everyone else seems to have owned that strip of land at some point.
____________________________
That monster in the mirror, he just might be you. -Grover
#50 Mar 20 2014 at 4:19 AM Rating: Good
Soulless Internet Tiger
******
35,474 posts
lolgaxe wrote:
angrymnk wrote:
Why not blame Canada?
Because if you're gonna blame someone, you kind of want a believable scape-goat.
That's right. If we wanted them gone we'd politely ask them to leave. Or drop Celine Dion off in one of their major tourist destinations.
____________________________
Donate. One day it could be your family.


An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo

#51 Mar 20 2014 at 7:13 AM Rating: Good
*******
50,767 posts
I still don't understand why we haven't tried to install democracy in Canada for offenses like that.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 286 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (286)