Forum Settings
       
« Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Reply To Thread

Cash shop announced?Follow

#1 Oct 19 2014 at 10:37 PM Rating: Decent
I heard that they announced at Fan Fest that they're expanding the cash shop with clothes, minions, mounts, etc.

What do we think about this?

Edit: apparently Sleipnir mount is one of the first things in it? anyone hear pricing on this stuff? is all the stuff cash shop exclusive or can you get it in game too?

Edited, Oct 20th 2014 12:40am by lass5

Edited, Oct 20th 2014 12:40am by lass5
#2 Oct 19 2014 at 10:57 PM Rating: Excellent
***
3,737 posts
Most of it's pretty cheap. I think the most expensive thing they announced the price of was Fantasia at 10 bucks if you buy them one at a time. I assume Slepnier will be around 20 or 25, but they didn't actually announce that.

I have no problem with cash shop cosmetic stuff as long as:
A: It keeps itself to cosmetic stuff and
B: It isn't at the cost of having cool cosmetic stuff from in-game rewards

Blizzard's been getting itself into trouble with that second one lately. Their most original mounts are showing up in the store and not on in-game sources, and it's starting to earn them some backlash. So just avoid doing that and we're probably fine.
____________________________
svlyons wrote:
If random outcomes aren't acceptable to you, then don't play with random people.
#3 Oct 19 2014 at 11:16 PM Rating: Decent
It sucks if you can't get all the cash shop items in-game, because I'm poor.
#4 Oct 19 2014 at 11:19 PM Rating: Excellent
****
5,729 posts
As long is it's not pay-to-win I have no problem with it. If someone wants to pay real money for a minion or a fancy mount, who cares?
____________________________
75 Rabbit/75 Sheep/75 Coeurl/75 Eft/75 Raptor/75 Hippogryph/75 Puk
75 Scorpion/75 Wamoura/75 Pixie/75 Peiste/64 Sabotender
51 Bird/41 Mandragora/40 Bee/37 Crawler/37 Bat

Items no one cares about: O
Missions no one cares about: O
Crafts no one cares about: O
#5 Oct 19 2014 at 11:20 PM Rating: Decent
Karlina wrote:
As long is it's not pay-to-win I have no problem with it. If someone wants to pay real money for a minion or a fancy mount, who cares?


Because I would feel bad if everyone is running around with cool mounts and costumes and I don't have enough $$
#6 Oct 19 2014 at 11:37 PM Rating: Decent
Scholar
Avatar
***
1,339 posts
lass5 wrote:
Because I would feel bad if everyone is running around with cool mounts and costumes and I don't have enough $$


That's an excuse, not a reason.
#7 Oct 19 2014 at 11:44 PM Rating: Default
Viertel wrote:
lass5 wrote:
Because I would feel bad if everyone is running around with cool mounts and costumes and I don't have enough $$


That's an excuse, not a reason.


What? The person said "who cares?" and I said I would care and why... Since I already pay 15 bucks a month and I bought the box, it's a lot to ask for more money for exclusive cash shop costumes and mounts.

Nice rate down spamming because I don't like the new cash shop.

Edited, Oct 20th 2014 1:46am by lass5
#8 Oct 20 2014 at 12:13 AM Rating: Decent
Scholar
****
4,511 posts
It's bad marketing, especially when non-paying members cannot obtain the same item. Most of the things we PLAY for are esthetics and pretty looks, actual gear we have done in a week, after that, myself especially, am only here for mounts, minions and pretty looking clothes.

It frustrates me endlessly, but the alternatives to fix it arent much better.

1) You could let people buy it with real money, and let them put it on the boards for gil. But this will quickly give gil a real world money value.
2) Go free to play and they can have all the cash shop they want. But the quality of a F2P game is going to make this a horrible experience.
3) You could let people buy it with real money, and have a vendor sell it for Gil or give it to you after a long (beastmen) questline. This would be the least objectionable way.

Given SE's poor track record at giving us new stuff they didnt simply blatantly recolour, this is going to BADLY affect what we have ingame. Just look at CT gear or Soldiery. Staves, Robes, there's only like 3 diffirent models with a diffirent texture skin over all of those. If SE is already this lazy (and is getting away with it), imagine how bad it would be if they put all their original ideas behind a $$$-lock and let the (still monthly paying members, certainly not f2p, i point out to you) people obtain the scraps and recolours.

I like the game, but greedy crap like this would easily kill it for me.

Edited, Oct 20th 2014 8:14am by KojiroSoma
____________________________
[XI] Surivere of Valefor
[XIV] Sir Surian Bedivere of Behemoth
http://na.finalfantasyxiv.com/lodestone/character/2401553/
#9 Oct 20 2014 at 12:26 AM Rating: Decent
KojiroSoma wrote:
It's bad marketing, especially when non-paying members cannot obtain the same item. Most of the things we PLAY for are esthetics and pretty looks, actual gear we have done in a week, after that, myself especially, am only here for mounts, minions and pretty looking clothes.

It frustrates me endlessly, but the alternatives to fix it arent much better.

1) You could let people buy it with real money, and let them put it on the boards for gil. But this will quickly give gil a real world money value.
2) Go free to play and they can have all the cash shop they want. But the quality of a F2P game is going to make this a horrible experience.
3) You could let people buy it with real money, and have a vendor sell it for Gil or give it to you after a long (beastmen) questline. This would be the least objectionable way.

Given SE's poor track record at giving us new stuff they didnt simply blatantly recolour, this is going to BADLY affect what we have ingame. Just look at CT gear or Soldiery. Staves, Robes, there's only like 3 diffirent models with a diffirent texture skin over all of those. If SE is already this lazy (and is getting away with it), imagine how bad it would be if they put all their original ideas behind a $$$-lock and let the (still monthly paying members, certainly not f2p, i point out to you) people obtain the scraps and recolours.

I like the game, but greedy crap like this would easily kill it for me.

Edited, Oct 20th 2014 8:14am by KojiroSoma


There's just so much comedy to be had by saying SE has a poor track record at giving us new stuff they didn't simply blatantly obviously lazily half-as*edly (got carried away by the hyperbole, sorry) recolour, when SE consistently puts out more new stuff for their game than 99,9% of the MMO's - no, games in general, do.

When the devs completely obliterate the standard and you call that poor track record, that tells us more about you than the game.

Edited, Oct 20th 2014 6:27am by Hyanmen
#10 Oct 20 2014 at 5:40 AM Rating: Decent
Scholar
****
4,511 posts
Hyanmen wrote:
There's just so much comedy to be had by saying SE has a poor track record at giving us new stuff they didn't simply blatantly obviously lazily half-as*edly (got carried away by the hyperbole, sorry) recolour, when SE consistently puts out more new stuff for their game than 99,9% of the MMO's - no, games in general, do.

When the devs completely obliterate the standard and you call that poor track record, that tells us more about you than the game.

Edited, Oct 20th 2014 6:27am by Hyanmen

You arent very good at reading. Nowhere am i making a comparison to other MMO's. I dont care about other MMO's. If World of Warcraft to name an example hasnt gotten anything at all in a year and we got some additions, why would i care that World of Warcraft has it worse than us? I'm not playing that.

Final Fantasy XIV is all i'm discussing. And their armors lately have been nothing short of recolors with the same base-model. I would call that lazy. Anyone would. Bard and Dragoon gear from CT are exactly the same. Monk and BLM soldiery gear is exactly the same. Staves are just shades for the most part. Spears get a diffirent colored handle. All cuirass share the same model except for the shoulders. All low level robes share the same model. i100 from ST are pretty lazy copy's of the monsters in there. There's sticking to a "theme" and there's 1:1 using the body/legs/hands/feet/head model for it.

The most likely follow-up to that, as clearly shown in the OP with the sleipnir mount, is that original work is going to be locked behind a "optional" pay option if we let them get away with this, and we will continue to get the lazy re-colors of existing gear we've been getting. IF, and only if, the quality and quantity of our gear additions isnt going to suffer from this as well since they have more work to do now.

I am of the belief, and so should you, that original gear should be obtainable by us regardless of extra costs. We're already paying for the game each month already. Why you're suddenly advocating paying extra for things that should be obtainable by us all is beyond me.
____________________________
[XI] Surivere of Valefor
[XIV] Sir Surian Bedivere of Behemoth
http://na.finalfantasyxiv.com/lodestone/character/2401553/
#11 Oct 20 2014 at 8:03 AM Rating: Good
*
108 posts
my vote, no cash anything except your monthly sub. I would actually be ashamed and embarrassed to be seen running around in anything be it gear or mounts that has been purchased with real money. We pay em enough.
#12 Oct 20 2014 at 8:32 AM Rating: Decent
KojiroSoma wrote:
Hyanmen wrote:
There's just so much comedy to be had by saying SE has a poor track record at giving us new stuff they didn't simply blatantly obviously lazily half-as*edly (got carried away by the hyperbole, sorry) recolour, when SE consistently puts out more new stuff for their game than 99,9% of the MMO's - no, games in general, do.

When the devs completely obliterate the standard and you call that poor track record, that tells us more about you than the game.

Edited, Oct 20th 2014 6:27am by Hyanmen

You arent very good at reading. Nowhere am i making a comparison to other MMO's. I dont care about other MMO's. If World of Warcraft to name an example hasnt gotten anything at all in a year and we got some additions, why would i care that World of Warcraft has it worse than us? I'm not playing that.

Final Fantasy XIV is all i'm discussing. And their armors lately have been nothing short of recolors with the same base-model. I would call that lazy. Anyone would. Bard and Dragoon gear from CT are exactly the same. Monk and BLM soldiery gear is exactly the same. Staves are just shades for the most part. Spears get a diffirent colored handle. All cuirass share the same model except for the shoulders. All low level robes share the same model. i100 from ST are pretty lazy copy's of the monsters in there. There's sticking to a "theme" and there's 1:1 using the body/legs/hands/feet/head model for it.

The most likely follow-up to that, as clearly shown in the OP with the sleipnir mount, is that original work is going to be locked behind a "optional" pay option if we let them get away with this, and we will continue to get the lazy re-colors of existing gear we've been getting. IF, and only if, the quality and quantity of our gear additions isnt going to suffer from this as well since they have more work to do now.

I am of the belief, and so should you, that original gear should be obtainable by us regardless of extra costs. We're already paying for the game each month already. Why you're suddenly advocating paying extra for things that should be obtainable by us all is beyond me.


Just in case you did not understand, I am pointing out how out of reality your standards are by pointing out the actual reality of the state of affairs. You not making any comparisons, not the least to the actual reality outside your personal unrealistic standards, is the point of my post. <insert a poor jab of your reading comprehension here>

SE offers the best value for buck in the industry as far as original content is concerned. That they do not go even beyond that and meet your unrealistic expectations is too bad for you, yet I don't know why anyone should care.

Perhaps by actually caring about what the competition is doing, makes you appreciate what SE is doing for us - it's not like they are personally indebted to you to make less money than the competition.

Edited, Oct 20th 2014 2:38pm by Hyanmen
#13 Oct 20 2014 at 8:47 AM Rating: Excellent
***
2,550 posts
lass5 wrote:
I heard that they announced at Fan Fest that they're expanding the cash shop with clothes, minions, mounts, etc.

What do we think about this?


What do I think? Horse armor
#14 Oct 20 2014 at 9:03 AM Rating: Good
****
5,745 posts
lass5 wrote:
Karlina wrote:
As long is it's not pay-to-win I have no problem with it. If someone wants to pay real money for a minion or a fancy mount, who cares?

Because I would feel bad if everyone is running around with cool mounts and costumes and I don't have enough $$

I feel bad that someone drives around in a Lexus that I can't afford, when the car I can afford is perfectly suitable for my lifestyle. The auto industry needs to make a Lexus as attainable as a Saturn.
#15 Oct 20 2014 at 9:03 AM Rating: Good
Scholar
***
1,732 posts
I dont like it...
____________________________
FFXI: Nashred
Server: Phoenix

FFXIV : Sir Nashred
server: Ultros
#16 Oct 20 2014 at 9:12 AM Rating: Decent
Scholar
Avatar
***
1,036 posts
svlyons wrote:
lass5 wrote:
Karlina wrote:
As long is it's not pay-to-win I have no problem with it. If someone wants to pay real money for a minion or a fancy mount, who cares?

Because I would feel bad if everyone is running around with cool mounts and costumes and I don't have enough $$

I feel bad that someone drives around in a Lexus that I can't afford, when the car I can afford is perfectly suitable for my lifestyle. The auto industry needs to make a Lexus as attainable as a Saturn.


MMOs should be a level playing field where ability and dedication set players apart not how much disposable income they have IRL. Most of us play games for enjoyment and to escape, albeit briefly, from the many pressures our day to day lives already provide. In a game where appearance is arguably the real advancement in the game I can understand player concern over the introduction of a cash shop.

Edited, Oct 20th 2014 3:13pm by Releaser
____________________________
Fey :: Excalibur :: FFXIV
Releaser :: Fenrir :: FFXI
Grizzlebeard :: Drinal :: EQ
Crossbones :: Aggramar :: WoW
#17 Oct 20 2014 at 9:44 AM Rating: Default
svlyons wrote:
lass5 wrote:
Karlina wrote:
As long is it's not pay-to-win I have no problem with it. If someone wants to pay real money for a minion or a fancy mount, who cares?

Because I would feel bad if everyone is running around with cool mounts and costumes and I don't have enough $$

I feel bad that someone drives around in a Lexus that I can't afford, when the car I can afford is perfectly suitable for my lifestyle. The auto industry needs to make a Lexus as attainable as a Saturn.


do you even believe what you're posting? So you're ok with the more rich people IRL having more items/exclusive items? isn't the whole point that it's a fantasy world? you approve of people's IRL financial status flooding into our Final Fantasy?

Fail post
#18 Oct 20 2014 at 9:56 AM Rating: Default
lass5 wrote:
svlyons wrote:
lass5 wrote:
Karlina wrote:
As long is it's not pay-to-win I have no problem with it. If someone wants to pay real money for a minion or a fancy mount, who cares?

Because I would feel bad if everyone is running around with cool mounts and costumes and I don't have enough $$

I feel bad that someone drives around in a Lexus that I can't afford, when the car I can afford is perfectly suitable for my lifestyle. The auto industry needs to make a Lexus as attainable as a Saturn.


do you even believe what you're posting? So you're ok with the more rich people IRL having more items/exclusive items? isn't the whole point that it's a fantasy world? you approve of people's IRL financial status flooding into our Final Fantasy?

Fail post


Maybe some of us simply don't like act as if a switch has been suddenly turned on which was off before. We have been given neat in-game stuff and services with rl cash since the days of 1.0. You were not on the barricades when people around you were hopping on their fat capitalist chocobos yet now suddenly the devil has descended on Eorzea?
#19 Oct 20 2014 at 10:09 AM Rating: Excellent
*******
50,767 posts
Occupy Eorzea! All the experience I put into underwater basketweaving shouldn't prevent me from end game loot!
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#20 Oct 20 2014 at 10:14 AM Rating: Excellent
**
255 posts
lass5 wrote:
svlyons wrote:
lass5 wrote:
Karlina wrote:
As long is it's not pay-to-win I have no problem with it. If someone wants to pay real money for a minion or a fancy mount, who cares?

Because I would feel bad if everyone is running around with cool mounts and costumes and I don't have enough $$

I feel bad that someone drives around in a Lexus that I can't afford, when the car I can afford is perfectly suitable for my lifestyle. The auto industry needs to make a Lexus as attainable as a Saturn.


do you even believe what you're posting? So you're ok with the more rich people IRL having more items/exclusive items? isn't the whole point that it's a fantasy world? you approve of people's IRL financial status flooding into our Final Fantasy?

Fail post


Uhhh, these demarcations are already in the game, and many other video games. What else do you call Collector's Editions and people who get exclusive items for shelling out more cash? You could even argue the fans who can take plane trips across the world to fanfests and get codes for exclusive items are "more rich" as well.
#21 Oct 20 2014 at 10:24 AM Rating: Excellent
***
3,737 posts
Quote:
Uhhh, these demarcations are already in the game, and many other video games. What else do you call Collector's Editions and people who get exclusive items for shelling out more cash? You could even argue the fans who can take plane trips across the world to fanfests and get codes for exclusive items are "more rich" as well.


Better hide my coeurl mount!
____________________________
svlyons wrote:
If random outcomes aren't acceptable to you, then don't play with random people.
#22 Oct 20 2014 at 10:49 AM Rating: Excellent
I also hope anything in the shop is somehow available in the game. The cash shop could still be profitable for those who'd rather take a shortcut to get a cool weapon skin or mount.

I also won't terribly mind if there are exclusive vanity items that can only be bought in the shop, but ONLY if there are still plenty of equally cool vanity items in the game. I don't want this turning into Guild Wars 2, where, for the longest time, you had no choice but to buy from the cash shop to have any kind of cool-looking gear.

This is already P2P, so anything in the shop should be available at some point in the game.
____________________________
Thayos Redblade
Jormungandr
Hyperion
#23 Oct 20 2014 at 11:00 AM Rating: Decent
****
4,175 posts
Leaving themselves the opportunity to transition to F2P. I can't really say that I'm surprised because I saw it coming from a mile away.

Only two small points to make here. First point is that I would be disappointed if the products offered in the cash shop were exclusive. Meaning that they're only available from the cash shop and not something you can earn or purchase with gil in game. Knowing SE, they probably are as they aren't too concerned about their players when it comes to the crusade against RMT.

Second point is, well I don't really have a second point. Just wanted to do the same thing I've been doing for years on these forums and say...

Told ya so Smiley: grin

____________________________
Rinsui wrote:
Only hips + boobs all day and hips + boobs all over my icecream

HaibaneRenmei wrote:
30 bucks is almost free

cocodojo wrote:
Its personal preference and all, but yes we need to educate WoW players that this is OUR game, these are Characters and not Toons. Time to beat that into them one at a time.
#24 Oct 20 2014 at 11:06 AM Rating: Decent
Scholar
***
1,732 posts
Thayos wrote:
I also hope anything in the shop is somehow available in the game. The cash shop could still be profitable for those who'd rather take a shortcut to get a cool weapon skin or mount.

I also won't terribly mind if there are exclusive vanity items that can only be bought in the shop, but ONLY if there are still plenty of equally cool vanity items in the game. I don't want this turning into Guild Wars 2, where, for the longest time, you had no choice but to buy from the cash shop to have any kind of cool-looking gear.

This is already P2P, so anything in the shop should be available at some point in the game.



Actually if the stuff was available in game too like you said Thayos I would be cool with it then..

Here is the real problem... If these things are successful and they make allot of money, things that should be available in game wont be they will add them to the cash shop instead.. Cool glamor items = cash shop, New minions = cash shop, new event items = cash shop etc. Its a dirty road.

Letting someone quest the items instead then I am ok with it like you said..
____________________________
FFXI: Nashred
Server: Phoenix

FFXIV : Sir Nashred
server: Ultros
#25 Oct 20 2014 at 11:09 AM Rating: Excellent
***
3,737 posts
Quote:
Here is the real problem... If these things are successful and they make allot of money, things that should be available in game wont be they will add them to the cash shop instead.. Cool glamor items = cash shop, New minions = cash shop, new event items = cash shop etc. Its a dirty road.


That's what happened to Blizzard, and it's starting to backfire because people are starting to notice that the really cool designs end up in the cash shop.

There's definitely a slippery slope argument to be made, and it's a legit one because it's happened in the past. But at the same time, if this brings in enough revenue to, say, hire more than one dude to design some of the bosses... that might be ok.
____________________________
svlyons wrote:
If random outcomes aren't acceptable to you, then don't play with random people.
#26 Oct 20 2014 at 11:29 AM Rating: Good
**
863 posts
Honestly I am more surprised at how many people seem fairly okay with it (considering what has been said before in for example the retainer thread) than I am with the announcement itself. In the end I will just wait to see how they implement it, but like Callinon mentioned it is a slippery slope.
« Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 221 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (221)